Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wahidullah Noorzai | NIDA's avatar

What makes an introduction to International Relations genuinely valuable is not simply the number of theories or global issues it presents, but whether it teaches the reader how to move from concepts to reality.

International Relations is ultimately tested in the field. States, institutions, armed groups, societies, economies and individuals do not always behave according to the assumptions of a theoretical model. They adapt to pressure, learn from outcomes, preserve options, and change their calculations as circumstances change.

This is why the relationship between theory and practice should not be one-directional. Theory helps us interpret reality, but reality must also be allowed to challenge, refine, or even correct our assumptions.

From a field-informed perspective, the analytical process begins with observation and experience, moves toward analysis and principles, and then returns to practice and outcomes. The outcome becomes feedback.

For me, one of the most important questions in International Relations is therefore not only “Which theory explains this event?” but also:

What did reality reveal that our existing assumptions failed to capture—and what should we change in our understanding after observing the outcome?

That is where International Relations becomes more than the study of international events. It becomes a continuing process of learning from reality.

Wahidullah Noorzai (NIDA)

Field Strategist | Military & Security Analyst | Field-Informed Strategic Reasoning

No posts

Ready for more?