Discussion about this post

User's avatar
(وحیدالله )wahidullah Noorzai's avatar

This preliminary report raises a question that deserves far more attention: can global AI governance keep pace with the speed at which AI capabilities are developing?

The challenge is not simply technological. AI is increasingly becoming an instrument of economic power, information influence, institutional capacity, security, and strategic competition. This becomes even more consequential in fragile and conflict-affected societies, where weak institutions, information gaps, limited digital literacy, and political instability can amplify both the benefits and the risks of AI.

From Afghanistan and the wider region, one lesson is particularly important: technology does not operate in a political vacuum. The same AI capability can strengthen education, public services, and scientific research—or deepen disinformation, surveillance, institutional weakness, and strategic dependency, depending on who controls it and under what rules.

For that reason, AI governance should not be designed only around the interests and capacities of technologically advanced states. The voices and realities of fragile societies must also be part of the global conversation.

The real strategic question is no longer whether AI will transform societies. It is whether institutions will be prepared to shape that transformation before the technology begins shaping the institutions themselves.

— Wahidullah Noorzai

Former Senior ANCOP/ANP Officer | Field-informed Security & Strategic Analyst

No posts

Ready for more?